MONITORING, PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION
Integrating the Monitoring at All Stages
by Phil Bartle, PhD
Monitoring is an integral part of every project, from start to finish
A project is a series of activities (investments) that aim at solving particular problems within a given time frame and in a particular location. The investments include time, money, human and material resources. Before achieving the objectives, a project goes through several stages. Monitoring should take place at and be integrated into all stages of the project cycle.
The three basic stages include::
Monitoring should be executed by all individuals and institutions which have an interest (stake holders) in the project. To efficiently implement a project, the people planning and implementing it should plan for all the interrelated stages from the beginning.
In the "Handbook for Mobilizers," we said the key questions of planning and management were: (1) What do we want? (2) What do we have? (3) How do we use what we have to get what we want? and (4) What will happen when we do? They can be modified, using "where," instead of "what," while the principles are the same.
Situation Analysis and Problem Definition:
This asks the question, "Where are we?" (What do we have?).
Situation analysis is a process through which the general characteristics and problems of the community are identified. It involves the identification and definition of the characteristics and problems specific to particular categories of people in the community. These could be people with disabilities, women, youth, peasants, traders and artisans.
Situation analysis is done through collecting information necessary to understand the community as a whole and individuals within the community. Information should be collected on what happened in the past, what is currently happening, and what is expected to happen in the future, based on the community's experiences.
Information necessary to understand the community includes, among others:
Information for situation analysis and problem definition should be collected with the involvement of the community members using several techniques. This is to ensure valid, reliable and comprehensive information about the community and its problems.
Some of the following techniques could be used:
Situation analysis is very important before any attempts to solve the problem because:
Situation analysis should be continuous, in order to provide additional information during project implementation, monitoring and re-planning. Situation analysis and problem identification should be monitored to ensure that correct and up dated information is always available about the community and its problems.
Since monitoring should be integrated into all aspects or phases of the process, let us go through each phase and look at the monitoring concerns associated with each.
Setting Goals and Objectives:
Goal setting asks the question, "Where do we want to go?" (What do we want?).
Before any attempts to implement a project, the planners, implementors and beneficiaries should set up goals and objectives. See Brainstorm for a participatory method to do this.
A goal is a general statement of what should be done to solve a problem. It defines broadly, what is expected out of a project. A goal emerges from the problem that needs to be addressed and signals the final destination of a project. Objectives are finite sub-sets of a goal and should be specific, in order to be achievable.
The objectives should be "SMART." They should be:
To achieve the objectives of a project, it is essential to assess the resources available within the community and those that can be accessed from external sources. See Revealing Hidden Resources.
The planners, implementors and community members should also identify the constraints they may face in executing the project and how they can overcome them. Based on the extent of the constraints and positive forces, the implementors may decide to continue with the project or to drop it.
The goals and objectives provide the basis for monitoring and evaluating a project. They are the yardsticks upon which project success or failure is measured.
Generating Structures and Strategies:
This aspect asks the third key question, "How do we get there?" (How do we get what we want with what we have?).
The planners and implementors (communities and their enablers) should decide on how they are going to implement a project, which is the strategy. Agreeing on the strategy involves determining all items (inputs) that are needed to carry out the project, defining the different groups or individuals and their particular roles they are to play in the project. These groups and individuals that undertake particular roles in the project are called "actors."
Generating the structures and strategies therefore involves:
After establishing the appropriateness of the decisions, the executive should discuss and agree with all actors on how the project will be implemented. This is called designing a work plan. (How do we get what we want?). A work plan is a description of the necessary activities set out in stages, with rough indication of the timing.
In order to draw a good work plan, the implementors should:
The work plan is a guide to project implementation and a basis for project monitoring. It therefore helps to:
The implementors and planners have to agree on monitoring indicators. Monitoring indicators are quantitative and qualitative signs (criteria) for measuring or assessing the achievement of project activities and objectives. The indicators will show the extent to which the objectives of every activity have been achieved. Monitoring indicators should be explicit, pertinent and objectively verifiable.
Monitoring Indicators are of four types, namely;
Writing down the structures and strategies helps in project monitoring because they specify what will be done during project implementation. Planning must indicate what should be monitored, who should monitor, and how monitoring should be undertaken.
Monitoring implementation asks the fourth key question "What happens when we do?"
Implementation is the stage where all the planned activities are put into action. Before the implementation of a project, the implementors (spearheaded by the project committee or executive) should identify their strength and weaknesses (internal forces), opportunities and threats (external forces).
The strength and opportunities are positive forces that should be exploited to efficiently implement a project. The weaknesses and threats are hindrances that can hamper project implementation. The implementors should ensure that they devise means of overcoming them.
Monitoring is important at this implementation phase to ensure that the project is implemented as per the schedule. This is a continuous process that should be put in place before project implementation starts.
As such, the monitoring activities should appear on the work plan and should involve all stake holders. If activities are not going on well, arrangements should be made to identify the problem so that they can be corrected.
Monitoring is also important to ensure that activities are implemented as planned. This helps the implementors to measure how well they are achieving their targets. This is based on the understanding that the process through which a project is implemented has a lot of effect on its use, operation and maintenance.
When implementation of the project is not on target, there is a need for the project managers to ask themselves and answer the question, "How best do we get there?"
Summary of the Relationship:
The above illustrates the close relationship between monitoring, planning and implementation.
It demonstrates that:
There is a close and mutually reinforcing (supportive) relationship between planning, implementation and monitoring. One of the three cannot be done in isolation from the other two, and when doing one of the three, the planners and implementors have to cater for the others.
Monitoring the Mobilization and Organizing:
© Copyright 1967, 1987, 2007 Phil Bartle
Monitoring and Evaluation