Home Page
 Reference


Translations:

'العربية / al-ʿarabīyah
Català
Ελληνικά
Español
Filipino
Français
Italiano
بهاس ملايو / Bahasa Melayu
Português
Română
Srpski
中文 / Zhōngwén

                                        

Other Pages:
Key Words
Modules

Sociology:
Home Page
Lecture Notes
Discussions
Hub

Utilities:
Site Map
Contact
Utility Documents
Useful Links

DISCUSSIONS ON SUPERORGANIC

moderated by Phil Bartle, PhD

Web Discussions

See: Bidney, Kroeber, Kroeber, Murphy

Contributions will be added to the top of this collection as I receive them

Date: Thu, 13 Jan

From: "Jamie G"

Hi, I am a little unclear if this is a way to add a comment to the blog opened by Adam regarding the Super Organic. If it is not, please let me know.

I think the easiest way for me to distinguish the in-organic from the super organic is to realize that something that is in-organic is a physical thing.

It is not living, however You could still theoretically touch it and see it.

It takes up mass. Something such as society that is super organic is NOT something physical. It has no dimensions and cannot be seen, handled or measured. It is like trying to measure a thought or an idea....it is impossible. That is how I view the "Super Organic". I could be way off and if I am, someone please interject.

Thank you,

Jamie G

Quality and Sales Coordinator

Uniserve Communications Corp


Date: Thu, 13 Jan

From: "adam l"

Hey! i was wondering if someone could explain that whole super organic deal? I'm sort of lost on the principles which distinguish inorganic from super.

Thanks

Adam

──»«──
If you copy text from this site, please acknowledge the author(s)
and link it back to cec.vcn.bc.ca/cmp/
This site is hosted by the Vancouver Community Network (VCN)

© Copyright 1967, 1987, 2007 Phil Bartle
Web Design by Lourdes Sada
––»«––
Last update: 2012.06.29

 Home page